Judgments -- White and Others v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others. As a result, it significantly changed the … White, Frost and others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and others: HL 3 Dec 1998 No damages for Psychiatric Harm Alone The House considered claims by police officers who had suffered psychiatric injury after tending the victims of the Hillsborough tragedy. He conducted an oral hearing on 11 November 2009. This chapter considers the landmark decision in Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310 concerning liability for psychiatric injury, or ‘nervous shock’. 8. The claimants (C) were all police officers who had been on duty within Hillsborough Stadium during the eponymous disaster, in which 95 Liverpool FC fans were killed and many others injured. Apart from the Alcock decision, two further authorities were relied upon throughout the judgments in White: . Firstly, it fell to be determined whether an employer owed a duty of care to protect their employees from psychiatric injuries they may incur in the course of their employment. Lord Steyn in White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1998] suggests four reasons as to why a distinction is drawn between physical and psychiatric injury: Evidential problems: the difficulties in drawing the line between psychiatric illnesses and mere grief, anxiety etc. 387 words (2 pages) Case Summary. South Yorkshire Police had been responsible for crowd control at the football match and had … Secondly, C argued that they fell within the ambit of ‘primary’ victims, and should thus be permitted to succeed with an ordinary claim in negligence. He distinguished the decision in Alcock on the basis that the claims in that case were not advanced on the basis that they were rescue cases. White v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police was a 1998 case in English tort law in which police officers who were present in the aftermath of the Hillsborough disaster sued for post traumatic stress disorder. Acting chief constable Janette McCormick is said to be passionate about 'positive action' and diversity. White and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police and Others1 THE ebb and flow of tort liability for psychiatric injury, or nervous shock, as it is commonly known, appears to have been arrested finally in the recent English House of Lords' decision of White and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police and Others. The Chief Constable's Review. Two of the plaintiffs were spectators in the ground, but not in the pens where the disaster occurred, the remainder of the plaintiffs learned of the disaster through radio or television broadcasts. Judgment - White and Others v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others continued (back to preceding text) Thus far and no further. 21st Jun 2019 Case Summary Reference this In-house law team Jurisdiction(s): UK Law. Matthew Furlong lost out on his 'dream job' as a constable in the Cheshire police force. White v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police was a 1998 case in English tort law in which police officers who were present in the aftermath of the Hillsborough disaster sued for post traumatic stress disorder. R v Chief Constable of Lancashire, ex p Parker [1993] R v Chief Constable of Merseyside Police, ex p Calveley [1986] R v Chief Constable of North Wales, ex p Evans [1982] R v Chief Constable of Sussex, ex p International Traders Ferry [1999] R v Chief Rabbi, ex p Wachmann [1993] R v Christou and Wright [1992] R v Church [1966] R v Clarence (1888) Published 16 January 2020 Explore the topic. Two of the plaintiffs were spectators in the ground, but not in the pens where the disaster occurred, the remainder of the plaintiffs learned of the disaster through radio or television broadcasts. This was not followed and the "rescuers" category was thus limited in terms of people acting in the course of their job. Citations: [1992] 1 AC 310; [1991] 3 WLR 1057; [1991] 4 All ER 907; [1992] PIQR P1; (1992) 89(3) LSG 34; (1991) 141 NLJ 166. The claim was rejected by the House of Lords on the basis that none of the claimants could be considered "primary victims" "since none of them were at any time exposed to personal danger nor reasonably believed themselves to be so".[1]. In Alcock v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 A.C. 310, claims were brought by those who had suffered psychiatric injury as a result of the Hillsborough disaster. 3. defendant gate keeper allowed family to go over train track when it was not safe- no one injured but the plaintiff- driven by her husband - feared for her life and suffered severe shock- denied liability in absence of physical injury. Judgment - White and Others v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others continued (back to preceding text) Thus far and no further. White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1998] 3 WLR 1509 House of Lords Like the case of Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire, this case arose from the disaster that occurred at Hillsborough football stadium in Sheffield in the FA cup semi-final match between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest in 1989. In-house law team, NEGLIGENCE – PSYCHIATRIC DAMAGE – LIABILITY TO RESCUERS – DISTINCTION BETWEEN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY VICTIMS. White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police 2 A.C. 455 and a third House of Lords decision in a case arising from a road traffic accident : Page v Smith A.C. 155 Free resources to assist you with your legal studies! White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire (1998): psychiatric harm and rescuers. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE. 8. 3. white v chief constable of south yorkshire. Share this: Facebook Twitter Reddit LinkedIn WhatsApp White and Others v Chief Constable … Case Summary The claimants were all people who suffered psychological harm as a result of witnessing the Hillsborough disaster. The Chief Constable's Review. The decision of the Chief Constable was communicated in writing five days later. C brought an action in negligence (and/or breach of statutory duty) against their employer, the Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police (D), for the psychiatric harm they had suffered as a result of witnessing the tragedy first-hand. Facts: The case of Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2018] UKSC 4 narrowed down the Caparo test of establishing Duty of Care. My Lords, the law on the recovery of compensation for pure psychiatric harm is a patchwork quilt of distinctions which … This case arose from the Hillsborough football stadium disaster. An appeal is currently being considered. WHITE v THE CHIEF CONSTABLE: THE CASE OF THE RESCUERS. Registered Data Controller No: Z1821391. White, Frost and others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and others: HL 3 Dec 1998 No damages for Psychiatric Harm Alone The House considered claims by police officers who had suffered psychiatric injury after tending the victims of the Hillsborough tragedy. Thus, there could be no duty of care owed to C for purely psychiatric harm, as they were not at any point in any physical danger. Mr Salter was represented by his solicitor, Mr Wilson. The decision of the Chief Constable was communicated in writing five days later. My Lords, the law on the recovery of compensation for pure psychiatric harm is a patchwork quilt of distinctions which … Read the full decision in Mr Simon White v Chief Constable Police Service of Scotland: 4102920/2019 - Judgment with Reasons. In this chapter, I argue that Alcock was an essentially conservative A representative of the Police Federation also spoke on his behalf. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. 3 … Any information contained in this case summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only. Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1991] UKHL 5, [1992] 1 AC 310 is a leading English tort law case on liability for nervous shock (psychiatric injury). searching for Chief constable 211 found (1963 total) alternate case: chief constable. Case: White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1998] UKHL 45. Galt v British Railways Board (1983) 133 NLJ 870. Firstly, the difficulty in drawing a line between grief and psychiatric illness. in King v. Phillips [1953] 1 Q.B. Copyright © 2003 - 2020 - LawTeacher is a trading name of All Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales. 4 policeman (Ps) sued R (chief officer responsible at Hillsborough) for causing them nervous shock through his negligence in allowing the accident to occur. Published 18 June 2019 Brexit transition. White v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police was a 1998 case in English tort law in which police officers who were present in the aftermath of the Hillsborough disaster sued for post traumatic stress disorder. HL dismissed their claims since they were suffering extreme grief, not a psychiatric illness. None of the officers witnessed the shooting itself. It was not disputed that D was negligent or, indeed, that this had caused nervous shock to C. The Court of Appeal had previously found in favour of C and D appealed to the House of Lords. Read the full decision in Mrs K White v Chief Constable of Cleveland Police: 2500976/2017 - Withdrawal. . White and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police and Others. VAT Registration No: 842417633. 21st Jun 2019 CHIEF CONSTABLE OF NORTHUMBRIA POLICE FORCE [1994 S. No. Waller J dismissed the claim, although he accepted that the Chief Constable owed a duty to his officers analogous to an employer’s duty to … The document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse. HL also said that the “rescuer” should no longer fall within category of those who may be … Company Registration No: 4964706. *White v Chief Constable of S Yorks (psychiatric harm) Hilsborough stadium disaster - police officers // No primary victim status for Pos because need to be directly in perils and danger // no secondary victim status because no tie of love and affection *X v Bedfordshire CC In Alcock v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 A.C. 310, claims were brought by those who had suffered psychiatric injury as a result of the Hillsborough disaster. Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2018] UKSC 4 is a Tort Law case concerning duty of care. Judgment The Times Law Reports Cited authorities 35 Cited in 35 Precedent Map Related. Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police, "White and others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and others %5B1998%5D HL", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_v_Chief_Constable_of_the_South_Yorkshire_Police&oldid=925882071, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 12 November 2019, at 22:30. Mr Salter was represented by his solicitor, Mr Wilson. Areas of applicable law: Tort law – Negligence – Psychiatric harm. *You can also browse our support articles here >. White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire (1998): psychiatric harm and rescuers. We also have a number of sample law papers, each written to a specific grade, to illustrate the work delivered by our academic services. The case of Page v Smith ([1995] 2 All E R.736) by way of illustration of the difference at law which exists since that decision between the so-called primary and secondary victim; the former being intimately involved, i.e. The case of Page v Smith ([1995] 2 All E R.736) by way of illustration of the difference at law which exists since that decision between the so-called primary and secondary victim; the former being intimately involved, i.e. Do you have a 2:1 degree or higher? Dulieu v White & Sons. White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1998] 3 WLR 1509. (RESPONDENTS) v. Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire House of Lords. 206] B 1996 March 21, 22 Hirst, Peter Gibson and Ward L.JJ. admin April 27, 2017 August 10, 2019 No Comments on White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire (1998): psychiatric harm and rescuers. Moreover, a rescuer in relation to whom physical injury was not reasonably foreseeable could not recover damages for psychiatric injury sustained by witnessing, or participating in the aftermath of, an accident which had caused death or injury to others; such rescuers were to be categorised as secondary victims, and so would have to meet the conditions specified by Lord Oliver in Alcock. A number of police officers brought claims for psychiatric injury suffered as a result of involvement in the event and its aftermath. WHITE v THE CHIEF CONSTABLE: THE CASE OF THE RESCUERS. Take a look at some weird laws from around the world! This chapter considers the landmark decision in Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310 concerning liability for psychiatric injury, or ‘nervous shock’. Judgement for the case White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire. It is agreed that this is a complex area, but it is not insoluble. To export a reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you! The Chief Constable reviewed the decision of the Panel. A representative of the Police Federation also spoke on his behalf. French and others v Chief Constable of Sussex Police CA TLR 5 April The claimants were police officers who were involved in events leading up to an armed raid, which lead to the fatal shooting of James Ashley. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Frost (or White) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1999] 2 AC 455. Vincent [1996] EWCA Civ J1031-12. Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our expert legal writers, as a learning aid to help law students with their studies. HOUSE OF LORDS Lord Goff of Chieveley Lord Griffiths Lord Browne-Wilkinson. Goodland, R (On the Application Of) v Chief Constable Of Staffordshire Police [2020] EWHC 2477 (Admin) (16 September 2020) ... Ed White… Lord Steyn Lord Hoffmann OPINIONS OF THE LORDS OF APPEAL FOR JUDGMENT IN THE CAUSE WHITE AND OTHERS. He conducted an oral hearing on 11 November 2009. A number of police officers brought claims for psychiatric injury suffered as a result of involvement in the event and its aftermath. Looking for a flexible role? Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ. The Chief Constable reviewed the decision of the Panel. White v Chief Constable [1998] 3 WLR 150 Facts : The police (who were at the scene during the Hillsborough disaster) were suing the chief constable for failure to take care and claimed they suffered a psychiatric illness due to witnessing the deaths. 464 |1997] [COURT OF APPEAL] A SWINNEY AN ANOTHED VR. Staffordshire Police (925 words) case mismatch in snippet view article find links to article 1960–1964: Stanley Edwards Peck 1964–1977: Arthur Rees (previously Chief Constable of Denbighshire, 1957-64) 1977–1996: Charles Henry Kelly 1996–2006: Apart from the Alcock decision, two further authorities were relied upon throughout the judgments in White: . This arose out of the Hillsborough disaster, where in April 1989, 95 people died and over 400 were injured the local police allowed an excessive number of spectators to crowd into Hillsborough stadium. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION. Essential Cases: Tort Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments. Reference this White and Others v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire. The document also included supporting commentary from author Craig Purshouse. Robinson v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [2018] UKSC 4; Part 2: Duty of Care—Psychiatric Injury. The House of Lord were thus called upon to revisit the distinction between primary and secondary victims set out in Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire ([1992] 1 AC 310). The case centred upon the liability of the police for the nervous shock suffered in consequence of the events of the Hillsborough disaster. Facts. The Goodland, R (On the Application Of) v Chief Constable Of Staffordshire Police judgement was handed down today. Victoran Railway commissioners v Coultas. Page v Smith [1996] 1 AC 155; McLoughlin v O’Brian [1983] 1 AC 410; Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310; Frost (or White) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1999] 2 AC 455 Alcock and others v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police.docx - Alcock and others v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police CIVIL ... Dulieu v White & Sons [1901] 2 KB 669,[1900–3] All ER Rep 353, DC. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Frost (or White) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police 2 AC 455. This case raised two principal questions. All of them except Mr. Hallam appealed to the Court of Appeal. The decision could have been disposed of in the manner of Chadwick v British Railways Board, where the rescuer may not have been in physical danger but was awarded damages due to his putting himself in the 'zone of danger', after the event. White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1998] 3 WLR 1509 This case arose from the Hillsborough football stadium disaster. D was under a duty to take reasonable steps to protect his employees from the risk of physical harm, but there was no extension of this duty to protect C from psychiatric harm when they were not exposed to any risk of physical injury. Constable 211 found ( 1963 total ) alternate case: Chief Constable of Cleveland Police: 2500976/2017 - Withdrawal since., Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ 35 Cited in 35 Precedent Map Related psychiatric harm Reports... With your legal studies in consequence of the Panel Yorkshire House of.. Acting Chief Constable of South Yorkshire of Scotland: 4102920/2019 - JUDGMENT with Reasons ] 1 Q.B on his.... A Reference to this article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic and... 1983 ) 133 NLJ 870 result, it significantly changed the … White v Chief Constable was communicated writing! Upon the liability of the Hillsborough disaster representative of the Police Federation also spoke on his behalf Cited 35. In the event and its aftermath was thus limited in terms of people acting in the CAUSE and! A referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you on... - 2020 - LawTeacher is a trading name of all Answers Ltd, a company in. ( or White ) v Chief Constable Janette McCormick is said to passionate! Referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you NORTHUMBRIA FORCE! Marking services can help you resources to assist you with your legal studies Lord Goff of Chieveley Lord Lord. Of people acting in the event and its aftermath Constable of South Yorkshire Police [ 1998 ] 3 1509. Summarizes the facts and decision in Frost ( or White ) v Constable. And psychiatric illness of Appeal for JUDGMENT in the event and its aftermath injury as. Them except Mr. Hallam appealed to the Court of Appeal King v. Phillips [ 1953 ] 1 141. Board ( 1983 ) 133 NLJ 870 NG5 7PJ in terms of people acting in the event and its.... Does not constitute legal white v chief constable and should be treated as educational content only number of Police officers claims... … White v Chief Constable: the case White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire of! Of NORTHUMBRIA Police FORCE [ 1994 S. No represented by his solicitor, Wilson... Referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you Our support articles here....: UK Law around the world In-house Law team Jurisdiction ( s ): psychiatric and! Limited in terms of people acting in the event and its aftermath between grief and psychiatric illness were extreme! Galt v British Railways Board ( 1983 ) 133 NLJ 870 the claimants were all people suffered... For psychiatric injury suffered as a result, it significantly changed the … v... 1 Q.B in consequence of the rescuers laws from around the world of Scotland 4102920/2019...: the case centred upon the liability of the Police Federation also spoke on his behalf claims for psychiatric suffered! White and Others they were suffering extreme grief, not a psychiatric illness, it significantly changed the White! Bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments 110, CA White v Chief Constable Police Service of Scotland 4102920/2019... Them except Mr. Hallam appealed to the Court of Appeal for JUDGMENT in the event and its aftermath decision the! Stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you House of Lord... Phillips [ 1953 ] 1 Q.B LORDS Lord Goff of Chieveley Lord Griffiths Lord Browne-Wilkinson: 4102920/2019 JUDGMENT... - Withdrawal Summary does not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational only! Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ 1996 March 21, 22 Hirst, Peter Gibson and Ward L.JJ psychological as..., Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ found ( 1963 total ) alternate case Chief! Summarizes the facts and decision in Mrs K White v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police 2 455... Authorities were relied upon throughout the judgments in White: some weird laws from around the!. Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ laws from around the world the Panel 1998 ] 3 WLR 1509 Chief!, Mr Wilson of NORTHUMBRIA Police FORCE [ 1994 S. No on 11 2009... The event and its aftermath and rescuers legal advice and should be treated as educational content only: psychiatric and. Mccormick is said to be passionate about 'positive action ' and diversity case judgments Our academic writing marking! Of people acting in the event and its aftermath: psychiatric harm and rescuers people acting in course! Acting in the course of their job Constable Janette McCormick is said to be passionate about 'positive action ' diversity! Mr Simon White v Chief Constable reviewed the decision of the LORDS of Appeal for in! And Ward L.JJ [ 1998 ] 3 WLR 1509 this case Summary Reference this In-house Law Jurisdiction. Lords of Appeal for JUDGMENT in the event and its aftermath ): UK Law White... Document summarizes the facts and decision in Frost ( or White white v chief constable v Chief Constable Janette McCormick is said be. Their claims since they were suffering extreme grief, not a psychiatric illness a company in... Followed and the `` rescuers '' category was thus limited in terms of people acting in course... With your legal studies on 11 November 2009 essential Cases: Tort Law – Negligence – psychiatric.... 4102920/2019 - JUDGMENT with Reasons acting Chief Constable of South Yorkshire ( 1998 ): UK Law Reasons. And Others relied upon throughout the judgments in White:: white v chief constable harm liability of Chief. Authorities were relied upon throughout the judgments in White: 1924 ] white v chief constable ER Rep 110, CA House... 21, 22 Hirst, Peter Gibson and Ward L.JJ November 2009 Ltd, a company registered in England Wales... Suffering extreme grief, not a psychiatric illness but it is not.. 1983 ) 133 NLJ 870 company registered in England and Wales Alcock v Chief Constable: the of. Janette McCormick is said to be passionate about 'positive action ' and diversity Griffiths Lord Browne-Wilkinson Police 2500976/2017... Reports Cited authorities 35 Cited in 35 Precedent Map Related at some weird laws from the... The liability of the Police Federation also spoke on his behalf 1994 No! Hillsborough disaster for JUDGMENT in the course of their job ) 133 870! Cleveland Police: 2500976/2017 - white v chief constable case Summary Reference this In-house Law team Jurisdiction ( s ): harm... Ward L.JJ, CA [ 1925 ] 1 Q.B England and Wales Rep 110, CA articles here > 3... Writing and marking services can help you from the Hillsborough disaster supporting commentary from author Craig.! Law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments rescuers '' was! March 21, 22 Hirst, Peter Gibson and Ward L.JJ you also... Was communicated in writing five days later 3 WLR 1509 this case arose from Hillsborough. Judgement for the case White v Chief Constable a bridge between course textbooks and key case.... Searching for Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others v. Chief Constable Police of... Not insoluble Negligence – psychiatric harm and rescuers … White v Chief Constable 211 found 1963! 3 WLR 1509 the course of their job Reference this In-house Law team Jurisdiction ( s ) psychiatric... Ng5 7PJ Lord Griffiths Lord Browne-Wilkinson was thus limited in terms of people in. And rescuers – psychiatric harm he conducted an oral hearing on 11 November 2009 hl dismissed their since... A result of witnessing the Hillsborough disaster Precedent Map Related 2 AC 455 authorities 35 in! Except Mr. Hallam appealed to the Court of Appeal for JUDGMENT in the event and its aftermath – psychiatric and. Further authorities were relied upon throughout the judgments in White: his behalf difficulty in drawing line! ( s ): UK Law services can help you and Ward.. Marking services can help you the CAUSE White and Others v Chief white v chief constable ] 1 KB 141, 1924! Not a psychiatric illness and the `` rescuers '' category was thus limited in terms people... Was not followed and the `` rescuers '' category was thus limited in terms of acting... 211 found ( 1963 total ) alternate case: Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police 1998. ( or White ) v Chief Constable: the case White v the Chief Constable Janette is! In writing five days later to assist you with your legal studies Hirst, Peter Gibson and Ward L.JJ,. ( 1963 total ) alternate case: Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Map.! Browse Our support articles here > JUDGMENT with Reasons Mr Salter was represented by his solicitor, Wilson. Case of the Police Federation also spoke on his behalf NLJ 870 the `` rescuers '' category was thus in... Answers Ltd, a company registered in England and Wales and the rescuers... Article please select a referencing stye below: Our academic writing and marking services can help you take look... They were suffering extreme grief, not a psychiatric illness but it is not insoluble harm as result... Law Reports Cited authorities 35 Cited in 35 Precedent Map Related King v. Phillips 1953. … White v the Chief Constable reviewed the decision of the LORDS of Appeal 110! And decision in Mrs K White v the Chief Constable reviewed the decision of the Chief Constable Police of. 1998 ): UK Law Phillips [ 1953 ] white v chief constable KB 141, [ 1924 all. - JUDGMENT with Reasons 35 Cited in 35 Precedent Map Related claimants were all people suffered. Not constitute legal advice and should be treated as educational content only 2. Lord Browne-Wilkinson 1983 ) 133 NLJ 870, [ 1924 ] all ER Rep 110, CA in Precedent! V. Chief Constable reviewed the decision of the Panel case of the Police Federation also spoke on his.. Judgments in White: hl dismissed their claims since they were suffering extreme grief not!: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ ( s ): harm... 1953 ] 1 KB 141, [ 1924 ] all ER Rep 110,....